Search this site
Other stuff

Follow me on Twitter at:


All banner artwork by Brady Johnson, college student and (semi-) starving artist.

Locations of visitors to this page

My latest book:

       Available Now

Available now 

My book Machines are the easy part; people are the hard part is now available as a free download at Lulu.

 The Blue Skunk Fan Page on Facebook


Must-read K-12 IT Blog
EdTech's Must-Read K-12 IT Blogs





Student standard comparisons and a clean garage


(Click on image for a larger jpg image. For the same diagram as an Inspiration file, click here. Or as a pdf file.)

I spent some time this weekend finally getting around to trying to compare the new NETS Standards to the new AASL Standards. This was a tough go. While I usually write as means of putting off doing chores around the house, I actually cleaned the garage yesterday to delay working on this comparison. This was challenging task, but it was a good way to gain some familiarity with both new publications.

Both sets of standards are more complex than in their previous iterations. Hoping to address some of the widely discussed "knowledge work skills," both documents address creativity, independent learning, higher-order-thinking skills, collaboration/social networking, and life-long learning. More emphasis on the "affective" side of learning, if you will. ISTE has 6 major skills groups with 16 specific skill sets; AASL had only 4 major skill groups with 28 specific skill sets. (AASL also had other specifics in the categories of Dispositions in Action; Responsibilities; and Self-Assessment Strategies. For this comparison, I am ONLY comparing what AASL regards as Skills.)

In working on direct skill to skill comparison, I got frustrated. Separate skills in one document were often combined in the other (and vice versa). Shadings of meaning were evident. But there was still major overlap - even agreement - between the documents on the basics.

I decided a better way to approach the comparison was visually. So I fired up good old Inspiration and the chart diagram you see above is the result. The diagram displays all the areas and at least the basic idea of all skills in both sets of standards (or at least how I interpret them). I then color-coded each set and skill:

  • Red: Information literacy (we can quibble later about the actual name)
  • Yellow: Communication
  • Pink: Collaboration/teamwork
  • Green: Creativity, HOTS, application
  • Blue: Safe and ethical use
  • Purple: Reading skills
  • Orange: Tech skills
  • Light blue: Attitude (I am sure there is a better word for this)

A few initial observations:

  1. Information literacy, regardless of how it is organized, remains a major focus of both sets of standards. Squint and look at the red.
  2. HOTS (along with creativity and application) are a second major emphasis in both standards. I will be interested in seeing model benchmarks and assessment tools for these areas.
  3. ISTE still has some tech-specific skills and AASL some reading-specific skills. But they seem to be only a small part of each set.
  4. There is, as Jacquie Henry in an LM_Net posting calls it, a "slippery" factor to many of these "skills." AASL: "Read, view and listen for pleasure and personal growth" ISTE: "Exhibit leadership for digital citizenship"? Are describing student competencies here or describing a philosophical ideal?
  5. Both sets of skills seem overly ambitious. Schools and states will need to carefully pick and choose which skills will be included in their own IL/IT curriculum models and for embedding in the content area standards.

I would be DELIGHTED to see other comparisons/interpretations of these sets of standards.  Comments, as always, are very welcome.

Hey, and you should see my garage - it's never looked so good! 



Web Apps I use meme

Following a meme started at TechCrunch and shared by Will Richardson, I'll list my online apps I use. I'll group them by use frequency:

Daily (or more)
Gmail (via Entourage usually)
Squarespace (blog and website ASP)

Wikipedia (reader, not writer)
ISD77 website
Online bank

SmugMug (a commercial variant of Flickr)
Second Life
NWA online flight booking
Travelocity/Kayak/Orbit etc.

I can use on Pain of Death

All things considered, I expect I am a fairly moderate user of Web2.0-ish tools compared to most tech bloggers, at least one standard deviation from the norm of most educators. And like most of us, I see more and more of what I do move online, especially when using highly-portable devices like the XO and ASUS Eee. And I don't see the direction changing.

And like Will comments, the list is pretty Google-centric. Hey, even though they are evil, they provide useful and simple to use services. I've gone over to the dark side.

Readers, what SHOULD be on this list? 


Image source:


Ning privacy

Q: As a result of reading this post [Google Docs - Maybe Not] I did a Google Search of me. I found any thing I have ever said in a Ning Community. I belong to a couple. I was thinking of making one for my extended families so that the children could be included. I am glad I saw that because I unsure if I want that. Any suggestions that would be more secure for a family?

A: You didn't leave an email address so I hope you read my response here. My guess (and it is only a guess) is how restrictive you make your Ning settings may determine if they are indexed. Open Nings I'm sure are indexed; perhaps those that are private are not. I would definitely contact the Ning providers with this question before to using their service to plan any more bank robberies with the cousins. All the best, Doug

(Being able to tickle your own funny bone is a gift.) 

teengroup.gif Image from Ning homepage 1/5/08. Can only young white people use this service?