Search this site
Other stuff

 

All banner artwork by Brady Johnson, professional graphic artist.

My latest books:

   

        Available now

       Available Now

Available now 

My book Machines are the easy part; people are the hard part is now available as a free download at Lulu.

 The Blue Skunk Page on Facebook

 

EdTech Update

 Teach.com

 

 

 


Entries from April 1, 2007 - April 30, 2007

Saturday
Apr212007

The Need for Community

I am still trying to get my head around the tragic shooting at Virginia Tech earlier this week. Is it even possible to understand the depth of loss experienced by those who cared about those killed and wounded? Is it even possible for undersand the psyche of the young man who perpetrated the violence? And it is possible for anyone to reduce the likelihood of this happening again?

Two years ago, Minnesota experienced a school shooting on the Red Lake Indian Reservation and these were my thoughts I shared in a column that appeared in my Head for the Edge October, 2005. I guess I am reposting them here because I needed to re-read them.

The Need for Community
As I write this, Minnesotans are still in shock and mourning over the tragedy at the Red Lake School and its community. On March 21, 2005, sixteen year-old student Jeff Weise brought a gun to school and killed five students and two staff members and wounded seven more before killing himself. This was after he had earlier killed his grandfather and his grandfather’s companion in their home.

According to news reports, Jeff was considered an “outsider” in his closely knit, but impoverished community on the Red Lake reservation. He participated in online “communities” – ones that espoused violence and intolerance at nazi.org and www.abovetopsecret.com. Ones made accessible via the Internet even in this remote northern Minnesota location.

One of my first questions was how much did Jeff’s access to the Internet contribute to his terrible decisions and actions? I am sure I am not the only parent, educator or community member who wondered if he not been able to express his violent thoughts and receive support from other like-minded individuals, would he have made the choices he did?

Establishing cause and effect in incidents like these will always be speculative, and there are plenty of places at which we can point accusative fingers. Jeff’s life had been horrific. He reportedly had been abused and neglected as a child. His father committed suicide and his mother lived in a nursing home after a serious car accident. Jeff was American Indian, one of the state’s (and nation’s) most impoverished and disenfranchised ethnic minorities. And of course, the “bad seed” theory always surfaces as well. Jeff did not leave a note explaining why he took the actions he did, leaving us only sadly speculating.

One factor might be that Jeff, like all kids, looked for and did not find a sense of community “on the res.” When he could not find like-minded, sympathetic, caring individuals around him physically, he looked elsewhere and found it online.

So what does this have to do with technology, libraries and schools? We can ask how and why was Jeff “allowed” to visit and interact with others on web hate sites? Do the dangers and risks of such groups outweigh the useful, productive resources available on the web? Who was monitoring Jeff’s Internet use? Were the adults in his life even aware such vicious places on the Internet exist? Important questions, to be sure, but to me, Jeff’s Internet use ought to be considered more symptomatic than causal.  

Most kids look for and find “communities” with values that are life affirming and socially responsible. Boy and Girl Scouts, 4-H clubs, church groups, and both formal and informal groups revolving around special interests such as bicycling, hunting, literature, or sports play a big role in most young people’s lives as they grow up. Schools provide opportunities for socialization through athletics, music, drama, newspapers, business or art clubs. In these groups, young people learn not just about personal interests, but also about one’s fellow students and mentors and why they are worth caring about. And they are where kids often find that others care about them as well.

In our efforts to improve our schools and reduce school expenditures, extra-curricular activities are often first on the chopping block. Politicians and taxpayers see music, arts and athletics as superfluous. The “basics” are reading, writing, math and other purely classroom pursuits. Guidance counselors, teacher-librarians, coaches and club sponsors are nice extras only tangentially related to the real purpose of school. Sigh…

How many of us as teacher-librarians or technology coordinators make a conscious effort to create “communities” for our own students, especially for those kids who do not seem to have much success with the traditional organizations? Do you have a “geek squad” in which members gain self-esteem by helping students and staff with technology problems? Do you have library volunteers who watch the circulation desk, help re-shelve materials and created displays? As a former member of the “projector sector” – students who assisted technology-challenged teachers set-up 16mm projectors in my high school, I personally recognize how important such a seemingly small thing helped me establish a sense of belonging and camaraderie in school. And it’s why I, as an educator, encourage all of us to enlist the aid of kids for whom football or band are not exactly their thing.

I am not so naïve to believe that there is a single cause of school violence or a single way to prevent it. But St. Paul Pioneer Press reporter David Hanners wrote, “In the online world where he felt most at home, Jeff Weise has gained more attention in death than he ever did in life.” We all crave attention. What small part can we as teacher-librarians and technologists do to make sure the Jeffs in our schools get that attention in positive ways? Are we helping create “communities” for everyone? You never know what one thing may make a difference.

Wednesday
Apr182007

Preparing for educational climate change

Like most edubloggers, I am impatient for educational change. Unlike most edubloggers, I am old and cynical about schools being able to change themselves. Only forces from outside the established educational community will create fundamental change in schools - for good or ill.

We're already experiencing one external force in action - NCLB. Schools are fundamentally changing by having high stakes testing of basic skills drive planning, budgeting, and evaluation. This is school climate change that occurred over the past six years and not for the better.

But I am anticipating an educational meteor is on the educational horizon that will so dramatically alter the school climate that our current dinosaur-friendly environment will cease to exist and give rise to a new breed of educators -  affordable 1:1 computing.

Why am I thinking about this today?

Because yesterday I, along with a couple dozen other educators, spent six hours or so attending a workshop delivered over interactive television. I noticed a few things about the day's stand-and-deliver experience:

  1. Adults have no more patience with unengaging materials than kids.
  2. Everyone's standards for engagement are rising.
  3. Technology itself does not make an educational experience engaging.
  4. Given the opportunity, learners will find a way to be engaged without help.

About half of us had laptops. Our venue, one that normally does not provide guest wireless access, found a way to do so. Work/learning continued for those of us with laptops even when the program was about something we had already heard, was difficult to hear (poor video QOS), or was simply not delivered in style that invited attention. (I am trying to say this politely since the presentations were no worse than any one would see at a conference, but certainly no better either.)

Those of us with our own means of engagement tuned out - at least partially. We've all seen this happen at meetings and workshops - anywhere people have access to computing devices and means to get online. Prentsky says "Engage Me or Enrage Me." I don't know that it has to be that dramatic - "Engage Me or Lose Me" seems more likely.

Now what happens when parents 1) provide wireless access devices for their kids and 2) petition school boards for their kids to have access to them through out the school day? The call by parents for student cell phone access will grow after the tragedy at Virginia Tech on Monday (Vicki Davis expresses this very well.) and the line between cell phones and PDAs and laptops is blurring more everyday.

So what might be the hallmarks of the teachers who  survive this meteoric change? I'd put my money on those who:

  • are diagnosticians who use technology to help them create effective IEPs for all their kids using evaluation data that is accessed and manipulated electronically
  • are masters of differentiated instruction
  • communicate online easily
  • can identify, organize and prescribe online learning activities
  • are dynamic and engaging discussion leaders (and possibly lecturers)
  • figure out new ways of teaming with other educators to specialize in learning styles rather than content areas

What do you do when you have their bodies in your classroom, but their minds are everywhere but? I hope our pioneering 1:1 educators in Maine and Africa and elsewhere will be offering guidance!  

Photos from Plugging Africa's kids in to $100 laptop.

before.jpg
Before?

after.jpg
After?

Tuesday
Apr172007

We did everything right and failed to save our libraries!

Reprinted here with permission of the author. Originally appeared in the April MEMOrandom newsletter.

We did everything right and failed to save our libraries!

Last year the media specialists in ISD 622, the  North St. Paul, Maplewood, Oakdale school district, put together a presentation for our curriculum committees and school board. We had video clips of programs we created, pictures of students at work, grants we won, all the facts and figures from school library research, and a new curriculum for research in the district.  As the school board adopted the new research curriculum, we learned that budget cuts would cause the loss of central media services, including our coordinator.  At the time, I thought that the new curriculum and the fact that elementary media specialists covered prep time would save the rest of our program. 
 
In the fall of this year, I made an appointment with our Superintendent of schools. I wanted to talk to her about the research results from school library studies and the implementation of our new research scope and sequence. I sent two highlighted articles for her to read before we met. Superintendent Phillips was easy to talk to.  She proclaimed to be a library lover.  She seemed to understand how important it is to have licensed media specialists to teach vital 21st century information literacy. I left her office feeling really good about the future for our libraries.

chained_door.jpgTurns out the demise of central media was just the first salvo. Toward the end of February this year, we learned that the media department was once again on the chopping block.  The powers that be had given a list of proposed budget cuts to the school board. Those cuts included this item; “Restructure district media and elementary specialist time -- $275,500.”  This cut was listed along side other proposals such as; eliminate 5th grade band (2 FTE); Reduce nurses (2.4 FTE). It was obvious to me that the district was trying to hide the fact that 10 of our 14 media specialist would be cut. Once again all of the media people in district 622 rallied.  We put together arguments to combat the media cuts and contacted supporters to write and speak to the school board. [MEMO leaders] Lars Steltzner and Lisa Finsness came to speak at the budget hearings and made good arguments against cutting libraries. Parents, students and teachers also came forward to talk the board out of the destruction of our program. All to no avail. Our argument seems to have fallen on deaf ears.  At the final meeting, the board brought back all after school sports for middle schools, half of the 5th grade band, two high school counselors, etc., but nothing for libraries. The final wording from the board was: 

“District media services will be restructured, with a skilled paraprofessional or education assistant in charge of the daily operation of each site’s media center. Ten media specialist positions will be eliminated. Four licensed librarians or media specialists will manage the district’s 14 media centers. Media as a prep-time specialty would be replaced with a subject currently taught by the regular classroom teacher, thereby increasing time available for reading and/or math instruction. This recommendation does NOT mean school libraries will be closed – libraries will remain open and maintained.

Are you feeling angry?  I sure am. I am angry that the media specialists in the North St. Paul, Maplewood, Oakdale school district worked hard and followed all of the suggestions from ALA and MEMO, but still failed to save our program.  I am angry with the board of education, why are we required to earn a license in media when schools are allowed to keep libraries open with paraprofessionals and education assistants?  Would the department of education allow paraprofessionals to keep math, language arts, or science classrooms open? What is going on? I have only been a media specialist for 7 years and have now been cut from two districts. 

Okay folks, what do we do now?  How do we make the public as outraged about the loss of library teachers as they are about the loss of after school sports? What will it take to make people as angry about losing 9 elementary libraries as they would be if they lost the entire elementary math curriculum? Something has to change or we all might as well go back to school and learn to do something that people value.  It seems to me that we don’t have a leg to stand on as long as the state is not behind us. No wonder there is a shortage of media specialists. We can’t survive the way things are now.
 
Tori Jensen, Media Specialist
John Glenn Middle School

Yes, Tori, I'm angry - and sad and frustrated. And out of ideas on how we keep this from happening in other schools in Minnesota and around the country/world.

Or do we sadly accept the fact that society today does not value what libraries represent - the love of learning, the joy of  reading, the exploration of personal interests, the variety of views, the search for real knowledge, the reverence for the accumulated wisdom? I hope not - but I worry.

Readers???