Search this site
Other stuff

 

All banner artwork by Brady Johnson, professional graphic artist.

My latest books:

   

        Available now

       Available Now

Available now 

My book Machines are the easy part; people are the hard part is now available as a free download at Lulu.

 The Blue Skunk Page on Facebook

 

EdTech Update

 Teach.com

 

 

 


Entries from January 1, 2021 - January 31, 2021

Monday
Jan112021

BFTP: Solutions that are neat, plausible and wrong

A great deal of attention has been (rightfully) paid to the role of social media  in the political turbulence over the past four years. From use by an oft-tweeting president to conspiracy theory spreading to incitements to violence, Twitter and Facebook are being scrutinized for their role in what many see as the destruction of democratic norms. Very serious charges, indeed. This has led to the president being blocked on some sites and major companies like Apple, Google, and Amazon blocking access to alternative social media tools like Parler.

I wrote the post below about 3 years ago. It argues that the solution to the misuse of a technology is not banning it, but educating people how to use it thoughtfully and on focusing on its benefits.

After the violence of last week, I am reconsidering my perhaps too naive and optimistic stance. Are humans capable of using their tools responsibly?
_____________________________________________________________________
Caution: geezer rant follows...
From sexting to cyberbullying to FOMO, social media sure has its share of negatives. But, if it's all bad, how did 2,000 students protest their school system's budget cutsHow are teens leading the charge against cyberbullying? How did they organize a national school walkout day to protest gun laws? Easy: savvy use of social media. Caroline Knorr 5 Reasons You Don't Need to Worry About Kids and Social Media, Common Sense Media, 3/14/18
The most tiresome solution I hear to "technology-caused" problems is a simple one: take the technology away. No smartphones, Chomebooks, iPads, etc., no problem. Games causing a distraction? Block games. Kids abusing the chat window in apps. Close it down. Social media - ban its use.

The removal of an abused thing is often the first reaction we have when we don't really want to think too hard about the problem or use creative approaches to solving it. While I am not a fan of assault rifles, to think that outlawing them will prevent school shootings is wishful thinking. To tax soft drinks or reduce the size of the Big Gulp cup will end the obesity epidemic is naive. Delaying the construction of oil pipelines will not stop the environmental damage caused by fossil fuels. Hate to say this, but there were distracted drivers and automobile accidents before there were smartphones. 

Personal computing devices, guns, Pepsi, fossil fuels, and smartphones are not going away. And sadly, by taking a one-right-solution approach to the problems, disagreements that degrade into either-or thinking block collaborative, innovative problem-solving efforts.

Personally, I am a little tired of proposals that are designed simply to create outrage. Any proposal to ban a thing that I would listen to needs two elements:
  • Acknowledgement of there may be positives to the thing being banned (social media in schools can be used by students to create positive change)
  • Acknowledgement that a more nuanced, thoughtful, comprehensive approach to the problem is necessary - that banning a thing may be part of a solution to a problem, but only a part. (Teaching time management skills and raising awareness of technology addiction are part of good technology management plans in schools.)
For those outrage-fueled adrenaline junkies, this is probably too much work. But remember the words of H.L. Menken "there is always a well-known solution to every human problem — neat, plausible, and wrong.”
Friday
Jan082021

BFTP: Is it the head or the heart that makes a good librarian?

My friend Jennifer LaGarde writes in On Lost Library Books and the #BestPartofMyDay

... I landed at a school where collecting fines and keeping kids from checking out books, if they owed money, was just part of what had always been done, and I eagerly played along. I worked hard, every year, to collect every last dime that was "owed" to the library, and in the process made a lot of kids feel like they weren't welcome or that they were somehow suspect. It took me several years to pluck up the courage to decide I needed a do-over and to reset my circulation policies, so that they were more closely aligned to my core mission of helping students develop rich and authentic reading lives.  

And guess what? The number of books I lost as a result was minimal. I didn't end the year with empty shelves. Here's what happened instead:
  • I developed relationships with kids who I would never have gotten to know before, because their debt to the library stood in the way. 
  • I changed the library from a place of punishment to one of possibility. 
  • I was able to get books in the hands of kids who would have had no reading material otherwise.
  • My circulation statistics went WAY up.
  • I retired from the role of book police and was promoted to the job of reading champion.
  • I slept better at night.
And, ironically, I discovered that for kids who did lose materials, positive relationships are a far better motivator than the threat of not getting their diploma or not being admitted to a school dance. When kids love you and know that you love them, there's very little they won't do in order to not let you down.

If I could have new (or old) librarians read no other advice, Jennifer's words above would be it.

One of the happiest trends in professional reading over the past few years has been the emphasis on the value of and need for personal connections to our students. Knowing someone cares about how well you do in school is a critical for most kids, and too often that concern does not come from the home. It has to come from someone in the school itself.

What I loved about Jennifer's recollection is that the "heart" approach to getting library materials back was more effective than the "head" approach of fines and threats.

I suspect the heart approach works for motivating most adults too. Do your co-workers and those you may supervise know that you care about them and their success? Something I know that I will be thinking about. Thanks, Jennifer.
Wednesday
Jan062021

What gives you peace of mind?

Increased anxiety seems to be a common symptom of the CORONA virus and the isolation many people feel because of it. This week's writing prompt from StoryWorth got me thinking about how I manage stress and worry. For what it's worth... 

What gives you peace of mind?

Pick battles big enough to matter, small enough to win. Jonathan Kozel

 

I’d be dishonest if I said I always had perfect peace of mind. As I write this entry on a cold January morning in Minnesota, I will admit to having worries. I worry there will be violence when Congress votes to confirm Biden as president. I worry the national debt will have a negative economic impact on my children and grandchildren. I worry that the COVID-19 virus might infect my friends and family - and that small businesses will go under because of government restrictions meant to curtail the spread of the disease. I worry that the slow drip in the water line to my toilet will get worse. 

Yet overall, I enjoy a fairly anxiety-free mindset. I take to heart Stephen Covey’s advice about knowing the difference between one’s Circle of Influence and one’s Circle of Concern. In The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People, Covey writes, “Focus your energy and attention where it counts, on the things over which you have influence. As you focus on things within your Circle of Influence, it will expand.”

So this week, instead of stewing about the latest idiotic thing our president has done and ranting about it on a Facebook post, I will call a plumber. I will call my mother to check on her well-being. I will write this little essay for my kids. I will send a funny cat video to my grandsons. I will cook a meal for a friend. I will do volunteer grocery shopping for seniors. I will go for a good long hike and enjoy the beauty of the snow.

Over the course of my career, I found my “circle of influence” as an educator shifted. When I was a classroom teacher, I had a big impact on the 25 or so students in my classroom. I could teach them subject-pronoun agreement. I could help them interpret “Out, out, brief candle” from Macbeth. When I became a school librarian, my circle of influence grew to having an impact on all the students in the school, as well as their teachers. But the impact on each was less. I engaged with individuals for brief periods of time on an irregular basis. I was helpful, to be sure, but much of what I did like selecting good resources for the library did not have an immediate, measurable outcome. And finally, when I moved into the role of technology director and library supervisor, my circle of influence was even larger - every student, teacher, administrator, staff member, and parent - was impacted by the decisions I made and the work my department prioritized. But to say what I did made a significant difference to a single child required even a greater leap of faith. As an author and speaker, the occasional comment from someone at a conference about one of my articles or workshops, was the only sign that I influenced anyone through my work aimed at international audiences. 

But knowing that my impact lessened as my circle grew wider, did not really make me anxious, depressed, or sad. I was committed to improving schools and the experiences kids had in them by improving libraries and technology use. I, perhaps egotistically, kept making the ever longer leaps of faith I needed to feel I was making a difference. I did what I could.

In my personal life, I know that I cannot have a huge influence on the pandemic, but I can wear a mask when in public. I know that I can’t stop the increase in obesity rates in the U.S., but I can watch what I myself eat and get regular exercise. I have little control over environmental problems, racial inequities, or nuclear armament by Iran, but I can vote for the political leaders who I believe will work to help solve these issues. I will give to charities. I will volunteer. I pick up litter. While seemingly small actions, knowing I have at least some control over the things that worry me, is comforting.

Now in my dotage, believing that my family and friends are healthy, safe, happy - and still speaking to me - helps me sleep well. All members of my family know that I will always be there to support them, and I like to think they will be there should I need them as well. As my daughter says, “There will always be room for you in my basement, Dad.” Perhaps that brings me more peace of mind than anything.