Search this site
Other stuff

 

All banner artwork by Brady Johnson, professional graphic artist.

My latest books:

   

        Available now

       Available Now

Available now 

My book Machines are the easy part; people are the hard part is now available as a free download at Lulu.

 The Blue Skunk Page on Facebook

 

EdTech Update

 Teach.com

 

 

 


Entries from July 1, 2012 - July 31, 2012

Saturday
Jul212012

Ask better questions

I very rarely re-post other's work in full, but today's the exception. This short post by Andy Burkhardt is so important to libraries (and increasingly brick and mortar schools) that I'm making it really easy for anyone to read - you don't even have to click. (via Stephen's Lighthouse)

Ask The Right Questions

“Human systems grow in the direction of what they persistently ask questions about.”  - David Cooperrider

I have been thinking a lot recently about the power of questions in creating meaningful change in organizations. I posted earlier about taking a 6 week online class about Appreciative Inquiry. One of the principles of AI states that questions and change are not separate things. They happen simultaneously. One of the most important things that we can do in bringing about change is to develop and ask good questions.

So, if human systems grow in the direction of their persistent questions, what sorts of questions should we be asking?

  • Our budget has been cut again. How can we do more with less?
  • How can we show that we still have value?
  • How can libraries avoid obsolescence?

If these are the types of questions that we regularly ask at our institutions and our professional organizations and conferences then we are in trouble. If these are the questions that focus us, then we will constantly be thinking about proving our worth, avoiding budget cuts, and our eventual demise. We’ll be focused on fear as opposed to actually providing value and doing good. We need better questions.

  • How can we create amazing experiences everyday for our users?
  • How can we develop our students into expert questions-askers?
  • How can we make our libraries invaluable and irreplaceable in our communities?
  • How can we nurture abundant curiosity?
If questions like these are the ones that guide our thinking we’ll do extraordinary things. These questions aren’t trying to solve problems or even merely discover what we are already doing. These questions paint an optimum vision of the future and propel us towards it. Instead of trying to solve problems, put out fires, or simply stay afloat we are asking how can we create the kind of future we want.
What a great perspective! Thanks, Andy.
Thursday
Jul192012

Do old F.A.R.T.s have any value?

In response to my "history quiz," a semi- retired friend of mine wrote:

I like the title for those of us a bit out to pasture, so to speak. I hope I’m not becoming an anachronism----

The title I gave him was "old F.A.R.T." - Fraternal Association of Retired Technologists - a title that I myself may someday wear. 

Does age and experience count for anything when it comes to technology? Are young limber minds as necessary for rapid technical changes as young limber bodies are for physical challenges? Are we old farts, as my friend worries, simply anachronisms?

I have one of those birthdays that end in zero rapidly approaching. Whenever one's personal odometer's leftmost numberal flips over, reflection seems to result and I thought about this old column, Old Folks and Technology:

John Lubbock, a 19th century astronomer, once wrote:

There are three great questions which in life we have to ask over and over again to answer:
Is it right or wrong?
Is it true or false?
Is it beautiful or ugly?
Our education ought to help us to answer these questions.

I think of those words often when I hear educators worry about kids being more adept and comfortable with technology than those of us who were growing up when the earth was still cooling.

It’s hard not be humbled when a situation like this occurs as related by Monica Campana of Palm Coast, Florida, on LM_Net:

Last month Google was blocked by our district because kids were doing image searches and actual pictures loaded on Google image search hit page that aren’t blocked by our filter. Safe search in Google can be turned off by the kids. I vented, fumed, researched, emailed Google, but finally gave up and taught the kids how to use a few other search engines. One week later one of my seventh graders pulled me aside and whispered that we could still use www.google.ca - the Canadian version of Google, as of yet still not blocked. I had to laugh because I should have asked the kids in the first place. 

Many of us turn to those younger than us for technology help. (Older I get the more it seems like the more young people there are around all the time!) When I need help editing a digital movie, I turn to my 16-year-old son. He downloads movies, burns CDs, and uses IM to visit with folks around the world. If I need help getting the networked printer to work in the office, our 20-something network coordinator is the one I ask. When her fingers fly through the control panels they are a blur. Hands down, kids can do the technical stuff and are more comfortable with much of this stuff than I will ever be. And my VCR DOESN’T blink 12:00 either.

In 
Growing Up Digital (McGraw Hill, 1999) Don Tapscott calls the kids who have grown up with a mouse in their hands the Net Generation. Of these Net-Geners, he writes, “For the first time in history youth are an authority on an innovation central to society’s development.” I am not exactly filled with hope for the future when I think that the young, spiky blue-haired guy with more studs than a Minnesota snow tire is leading cultural change. (Darn, that sounded just like something my grandfather might have said!)

What I hope we don’t forget is that the same great issues of education that Lubbock identifies are still with us today and are perhaps more important than ever. When our students download music, we need to be there to ask if there is a copyright question involved (right or wrong). When they find sources of information on the Internet, we need to be there to ask them if the information is credible (true or false). When they put graphics into their presentations, we need to be there to ask them if those visuals contribute to the message they are trying to get across (beautiful or ugly). I like to think the questions we can help answer are more important in the long run than “How do you create a new background on a slide?”

We need to help make sure our students not only know how to use these new electronic marvels, but use them well. A short list of tools is below with some of the sensibilities about their use with which we geezers can still help:

Some technologies    Some things with which old people can still help
Spreadsheets    Math sense, numeracy, efficiency in design
Charting and graphing software    Selecting the right graph for the right purpose
Database design    End user consideration, making valid data-driven decisions
Word processing    The writing process, organization, editing, grammar, style
Presentation software    Speaking skills, graphic design, organization, clarity
Web-page design    Design, writing skills, ethical information distribution
Online research    Citation of sources, designing good questions, checking validity of data, understanding biases
Video-editing    Storyboarding, copyright issues when using film clips and audio
Chat room use/Instant messaging    Safety, courtesy, time management

No matter how sophisticated the young are technologically, in matters of ethics, aesthetics, veracity, and other important judgments, they are, after all, still green. By virtue of our training and life experiences, we can apply the standards of older technologies (the pencil, the podium, the book) to those which are now technology enhanced. And we’d better. Given the choice of having Socrates or Bill Gates as a teacher, I know whom I would choose.

I hope this remains true.

Oh, for the 30- and 40-somethings sniggering as they read this, an old fart is anyone 10 years older than you that holds antiquated views and values. You are probably already an old fart to the new teachers starting this fall.

 

Thursday
Jul192012

Four views on singularities

Daniel H. Wilson's new book Amped* offers a chilling future in which technologically-enhanced (not silicon) humans are a persecuted minority. Great social commentary, fast-moving plot, and interesting science, that moves Wilson out of the "fun but kinda-dumb" category of his first book Robopocalypse.

So I am not sure if my radar is more sensitive because of reading this book or if something's in the air, but three more singularity resources have appeared over the last week. Coincidence or something far, far more sinister????

Interview with Vernor Vinge: 

Dear Doug,

This morning, I published an interview with Vernor Vinge. Yes, THE Vernor Vinge -- the guy who envisioned the Technological Singularity, won five Hugo Awards, and is a patron saint to nerds everywhere.

It is posted at: http://www.educationfutures.com/2012/07/16/the-singularity-and-schools-an-interview-with-vernor-vinge/

Vernor is unbelievably smart.

He argues that accelerating technological change will bring about the end of the human era as we know it, and that the world will become so complex and foreign to human observers, it will be impossible to predict what will happen next. So, I asked, what does this mean for schools?

I'm really happy with how the session turned out, so please give it a view and share it with your networks if it seems interesting. Like all of our work at educationfutures.com, it is Creative Commons licensed, so feel free to reuse, remix any parts of it (or all of it!), and share alike.

All the best,

John W. Moravec, Ph.D.
www.educationfutures.com

I'd always given Ray Kurzweil the credit for the idea of a machine intelligence singularity. Now I know it was Vinge.

Speaking of Kurzweil, here is a short PBS interview. I like him better in his books than in person.

As Humans and Computers Merge ... Immortality?

Paul Solman interviews inventor Ray Kurzweil, who predicts that advancing technology will result in augmented brains, memories recorded on "mind files" and a greatly increased life span.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/business/july-dec12/immortal_07-10.html

Of course, lawyers can muck up even immortality - especially copyright lawyers....

Welcome to Life by Tom Scott

A science fiction story about what you see when you die. Or: the Singularity, ruined by lawyers.

I am waiting for cord that goes directly from my iPhone to my brain. Maybe for Christmas this year? 

*There is also another book titled Amped by Douglas E. Richards.