BFTP: Michael Jensen's information ecosystem

A weekend Blue Skunk "feature" will be a revision of an old post. I'm calling this BFTP: Blast from the Past. Original post, May 6, 2006.
"Today, if something's not available digitally, it's rapidly becoming as good as invisible." Michael Jensen.
As a part of the College of DuPage's Library Challenges and Opportunities April 28, 2006 teleconference, "Google Book Search," Michael Jensen, Director of Publishing Technologies at the National Academies Press, listed a number of ways in which one type of information is becoming more valued than another by today's searchers.
Here is the list he shared. When it comes to information:
- Free trumps cost.
- Open trumps firewalled.
- Easy trumps intricate.
- Fast sufficiency trumps clumsy quality.
- Integrated/linked trumps siloed.
- Findable trumps precise.
- Recommended trumps available.
- Updateable trumps static.
What Jensen shared is what a number of us see happening with K-12 students and their information seeking/using behaviors. They (and many adults, me included) are "satisfic-ing."
While Jensen is looking at information ecosystems through a scholarly publishing lens, we as school librarians and teachers need to be thinking about what this evolution means in regard to our programs and resources as well.
- Are our libraries/schools providing information resources that are "free, open, easy, fast, integrated, findable, recommended, and updateable" or "costly, firewalled, intricate, clumsy, siloed, unfindable and static?"
- Is there any reason to be buying print reference materials?
- How hard do we struggle against this evolutionary trend, working to put "quality" information into students' hands and ask that they give it priority in their own research?
- How do we as educators need to adapt to a new environment ourselves?
- Are we really committed to teaching the evaluation of information quality? Are we making any head-way getting all teachers interested in teaching kids about evaluating the quality of information?
- What must libraries do to successfully evolve given the evolving relationship people seem to have with information?