Three beliefs about online learning

I was pleased to be asked to serve on our state's Online and Digital Learning Council. This small group's primary responsibility is to advise the Commissioner of Education and the state legislature on what laws should govern the rapidly growing learning opportunities for student provided online.
I wish I could say I bring lots of expertise to this council. Other members have led, or are leading, online schools - public, charter, and private. Still others head their district's online learning initiatives or work for intermediate service agencies that offer support for school online programs. I am one of the two, I believe, representatives who actually work in a public school district. I hope I will bring a perspective that serves our district students well.
From my experience, from my readings, and from conversations with my district's excellent online learning facilitator, I going into this work with three main beliefs:
1. Online learning creates opportunities for my district's students and that is a very good thing. Online classes can provide students classes our district cannot. It can make learning work with unusual work schedules or other demands that make attending school from 8-4 difficult. Online learning may work better with some students' learning styles. And if there are options for learning, a few teachers may be put on notice because of the competition. All good for our kids.
2. Online learning needs to be regulated to make sure it adheres to state standards for both content and rigor. While schools can and should offer as many different learning opportunities as possible to their students, they also have an obligation to make sure that those opportunities are of high quality. Online learning needs to be aligned to state standards and it needs to offer the same level of rigor as F2F classes. We don't need kids taking online classes because they are easier or less work.
3. Every class ought to be a blended class. Online materials, activities, social/collaborative tools, and enrichment resources should be a part of every class - K-12. To make sure this happens, we need funding for teacher training, adequate bandwidth and content management systems, and the ability to provide devices to access this stuff for all kids.
I am not sure whether online learning will be a "disruptive" technology or not (See Avoid The Hype: Online Learning's Transformational Potential) - nor do I really worry much about that description. Too many educational reformers set about trying to instigate "disruptions" when I believe the real ones happen, like earthquakes or volcanoes, from natural forces we have no control over.
My goal is to see that education effectiveness for our kids is improved, whether through supplementing traditional educational institutions and practices or through providing completely new means.
Readers, what things do Minnesota's Commissioner of Education and Legislature need to know about Online learning?