Search this site
Other stuff

 

All banner artwork by Brady Johnson, professional graphic artist.

My latest books:

   

        Available now

       Available Now

Available now 

My book Machines are the easy part; people are the hard part is now available as a free download at Lulu.

 The Blue Skunk Page on Facebook

 

EdTech Update

 Teach.com

 

 

 


Entries from October 1, 2020 - October 31, 2020

Thursday
Oct292020

Revisiting the definition of stupidity

Hanlon's razor: Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. Robert J. Hanlon

Law 3. A stupid person is a person who causes losses to another person or to a group of persons while himself deriving no gain and even possibly incurring losses. from  The five universal rules of human stupidity by Corrine Purtill.

On a group hike yesterday morning, one participant who was a stranger to me shouted out, "I hope you all vote for Trump next week!" I suggested we not talk politics on this outing. "You must be rich," he replied, and quickly picked up his pace to get some yards ahead of me and my probable response.

My first inclination, I'll admit, was to fire back, "And you must be stupid." I kept the comment to myself. But I did brood on why that response came to mind instead of "What makes you think I am rich?" or "Why should I vote for Trump?"

I am not sure why, but stupidity sort of fascinates me. What is stupidity and why do people act in stupid ways - including me?

Cipolla Matrix

I'm not convinced one has to pose a hazard to others to commit an act that could be called stupid. Not wearing a seat belt, bungee jumping with a badly frayed cord, posting job-endangering photos to the Internet, or drinking from the toilet are all stupid acts as far as I am concerned, but none of them necessarily harm anyone other than the person themselves.

But an element of harm seems to be at the heart of most stupid acts. So if stupid acts are harmful, why do we still commit them? Why do all of us, even those who may behave intelligently and reasonably most of the time, do really stupid things now and again. And I very much include myself.

Is stupidity a quality that can only be discerned by others or not realized by oneself until after the stupid act has been committed, and is therefore unpreventable?

I've long worried that we confuse ignorance and stupidity. (See Seven stupid mistake teachers make with technology.) So any definition and explanation of stupidity is a welcome read. I personally define stupidity as having knowledge but not using it. Yes, I know the bungee cord is frayed and may break, but I'm going to do the jump anyway, sort of scenario.

Most of the stupid acts I commit are a result of over-confidence. My high opinion of myself applies to fixing things like plumbing, electrical outlets, and furniture, despite knowing from past experiences that my repairing often costs more in time and money than had I hired an expert in the first place. This tops my list of stupid acts. (See The quick fix: a tale of woe) Not admitting to ignorance or ignoring factual knowledge are the reasons stupid acts are made.

Anytime one defies the odds, they are acting stupidly. Any time one refuses to admit their ignorance or acts despite reliable information, they acting stupidly. Anyone one acts emotionally against their own best interests, is acting stupidly.

To be very clear, I would not label any individual as stupid (at least out loud). But I am happy to call out actions, even beliefs, that seem stupid to me.

It's OK to be ignorant. Ignorance, happily, is a correctable condition. But let's all try to do stupid things as seldom as possible. Including making snappy, thoughtless responses to others' stupid actions.

Why do you think people do stupid things?

Tuesday
Oct272020

Ctrl C, ctrl V - teaching basic computer skills again

 

I always get a chuckle thinking about the ooohs and aaaahs that came from teachers when learning how to cut and paste in a word processing program back in the early 1990s. Open-Apple A, Open-Apple X and then, the miracle, Open-Apple Z! If only life came with an "undo" function, I heard more than one teacher say. Those were the days.

Actually they still ARE the days.

Knowing that I am always looking for meaningful volunteer work, the administrator of the local Adult Basic Education (ABE) program called asking if I would like to help teach its popular "Computer Basics" class. So starting last Friday morning and for the next few Fridays, I am the teaching assistant/sub giving instruction to 17 adults, mostly English Language Learners, about clicking, pasting, saving, scrolling etc. "Basic" really does mean basic in this class. Even a tech director knows most of this stuff.

Personal computers have become more difficult to master over the past 30 years, not easier. Programs have more optional commands usually buried under more menus. There are more file formats and types of drives on which to store one's files. And of course, the Internet, social media, and safe computing have all made the task of mastering the personal computer more challenging. For a newbie, the course expectations must seem daunting indeed, even without having to struggle using English concurrently. Thankfully, there is an online program with good videos and practice exercises students can use to supplement the in-class instruction - once they learn enough to access it, that is.

Based on my experiences leading professional development classes for teachers, I wrote The Indispensable Teacher’s Guide to Computer Skills (Linworth Publishing) in 1998 (2nd edition in 2002). I thought it might be interesting to see if there was any advice that still holds value 22 years later. See what you think..

Seven qualities of highly effective technology trainers 

1. The problem is on the desk, not in the chair. When a problem arises, the best trainers assume that it is a result of a hardware or software flaw - whether an actual bug or a design in the user interface that makes the technology confusing for normal people to use. It’s sometimes tough to help people increase their knowledge without making them feel stupid or incompetent, but good teachers do. Phrases like, “My third graders can do that.” “You know it works better when you plug it in.” and “No, the other right arrow.” are not recommended.

2. No mouse touching. Good trainers are patient. One sure sign of this saintly virtue in teachers is that they never touch a student's mouse or keyboard. No matter how exasperating it becomes to watch that ill-coordinated teacher find and click on the correct button, good instructors' hands stay well behind their backs, no matter how white knuckled they become.

3. Great analogies. There is a theory that the only way we can think about a new thing is if we have some way to relate it to what we already know. Good trainers can do that by creating analogies. “Your email account is like a post office box. Your password is like your combination to get into it. Your email address is like your mailing address – it tells the electronic postmaster where to send your email.” Now here’s the catch: truly great analogists know when the comparisons break down, too. “Unlike a human postmaster, the electronic postmaster can’t make intelligent guesses about an address. The extra dot, the L instead of a 1, or a single juxtaposition of letters will keep your mail from being delivered.”

4. Clear support materials and advanced planning. Few things are more comforting to teachers than being able to take home a “cheat sheet” that covers much of the same material that was taught in class. Until multi-step tasks are repeated several times, most of us need reminders that are more descriptive than just notes taken in class. A short menu of task steps illustrated with screen shots is a gift for most technology learners.

Just as they take time to prepare good handouts, the savvy technology teachers check out the lab or teaching area well in advance (a week is best) for potential problems with workstations, software version, projection units, security systems, and network connections. Good instructors leave little to chance.

5. Knowing what is essential and what is only confusing. A good trainer will have a list of the skills the learners should have mastered by the end of the training. As instruction proceeds, that list will be the basis for frequent checks for understanding. As an often-random thinker, I find such a list keeps me as an instructor on track and provides a class roadmap for the learner. Now here’s the catch with this one: truly great technology teachers know what things beginning learners really need to know to make them productive and what things might be conveyed that only serve to impress a captive audience with the technologist’s superior intellect. (“The email address is comprised of the username, the domain name, the subdomain name, the computer name, all referenced in a lookup table at the NIC.” Like that.) It’s an alpha wolf thing, especially common with males. Be aware of it, and strive as an instructor instead to use charm and a caring demeanor with the pack to achieve dominance.

6. If it breaks, we’ll fix it. Kids catch on to technology with amazing rapidity for a very good reason. They aren’t afraid to push buttons. They know if they mess something up, it’s an adult’s job to fix it. That’s one nice thing about being a kid. However we need to instill in most of our adult learners the courage to experiment. Rather than always answering direct questions about technology, good trainers will often say, “Try it and see what happens. If you mess something up, I’ll help you fix it.” We tell our new technology learners that we can repair or replace anything but their original creations. The only real worry they should have is about backing up personal files.

7. Perspective. Many of us who work with technology do so because we love it. We play with new software on the weekends, surf the Internet deep into the evening, and show off our new gadgets like other folks show off prize winning zinnias, new powerboats, or successful children. I hesitate to use the term “abnormal,” but we are in the minority. Most teachers see technology as a sometimes helpful thing that should occupy about 1% of one’s conscious thinking time. It’s easy to lose the perspective that teachers are teachers first and technology users second – or third or fourth. Good trainers who can remember what it was like before there were computers – the green grass, the singing birds, the books to read, the parties to attend, the fishing trips, the face-to-face human communication– tend to be more empathetic. Think back, think back…

Saturday
Oct242020

BFTP: Libraries are just fining themselves

I've been on the 2 DVD at a time plan with Netflix for, what, ten years or more? And I have not once accrued a fine. Sometimes it takes a month for me to get around to watching one of these discs, but Netflix doesn't seem to care.

However libraries do seem to care if I don't get around to consuming the media I have borrowed. I've pretty much stopped checking out print books from public libraries primarily because I hated having a timeline imposed on when I need to have the book or media returned. And while the monetary fine is usually fairly modest, the sense of moral failure makes my library experience negative.

I was happy to read that some public libraries are rethinking the whole idea of fines. In the Huffington Post, Claire Fallon writes:

The NYPL would be far from the first library system to dump fines for children. New York’s Rochester Public Library made the move earlier this year, as did Pikes Peak Library District in Colorado. Others, like Oak Park Public Library in Illinois and Worthington Libraries in Ohio, already have or plan to eliminate fines for all residents. The key to this experiment, as Todaro explained, is finding ways to maximize access and positive relationships between libraries and patrons.

"Maximizing access and positive relationships between libraries and patrons" is, of course, the goal in this long overdue (pun intended) move. Fines, I'm sure, were motivated by good intentions by our Calvinist forebearers who saw punishment as good for the soul. And a fine is, after all, a form of extrinsic (and ineffective) motivation since a fine is not a direct consequence of a poor choice.

Burnsville-Eagan-Savage Public Schools' initiative to get all their students public library cards had as a critical component a no-fine clause. You mean kids can check out books from the public library and not pay a fine if they are late? Yup - just like Netflix.

How then might we encourage responsible use of library materials - in both our public and our school libraries?Some ideas:

Teach the "why" not just the "what" of responsible use. Why is it a good thing to use and return borrowed physical materials in a timely manner? Empathy is required here, but knowing everyone benefits from shared materials, but only when those materials are available is a good understanding to teach. People don't bring their books back to please the librarian, but to benefit other library users.

Set limits to the number of items that can be borrowed. If there are a set number of items one may checkout, the direct consequence of not returning one's materials is not being able to check out more materials. This is how Netflix works, of course. I don't get a new DVD until I return one. My only caution here would be to not let a long time pass without a child being able to get something new because he/she has missing materials - active intervention may be needed. And I would set the max number of items per user pretty high.

Work with the family. A good partnership between parents and the library will go further than any fines. I would start the conversation with something of a positive nature, compliment the child's reading habits, remind the parents of a no-fine policy, and then ask for their help.

Please remember....

 

Original post 5/30/17