« Picasso generator | Main | Typos »
Tuesday
Nov252008

Stop and take a deep breath

Our school district projects budget cuts of about three million dollars next year. That's five percent across-the-board if the cuts were to be made uniformly (which is impossible). And our district is in GOOD financial condition compared to many across the state, nation and world.

But you know, I am almost looking forward to the cuts. Echoing Tim (Assort Stuff) Stahmer's great blog post from a couple days ago, 2009-10 just might the year we can stop, take a real deep breath, evaluate our programs, reflect, and re-prioritize our budgets. (I rather enjoy doing budgets, making transparency a priority as long time readers may remember.)

This email below was shared with me by Nick Glass from TeachingBooks with whom I was visiting at the SLJ Summit. It was sent in response to a sales inquiry for his excellent product. (Used with permission, product names deleted to protect the innocent, see my product endorsement policy).

All I can tell you is that we are INUNDATED with electronic teaching resources. This past year we have implemented ________, an online writing program; _______, a comprehensive curriculum for math, language arts, and science grades K-12; the ______ program which is helps secondary and adult ELL learners learn English; ______ which is an ELL program for younger learners; _____ at the high school level; _____ at the alternative high school; and a new standards-based electronic gradebook.

We are tapped out, maxed out, and stressed out. We have all of the technology we can manage (more than we can manage actually) and we have neither the funding nor the capacity to look at any more resources in the foreseeable future.

Could this have been written by the educators in your district? While we have not implemented curricular tools and programs at the level described above, our district has been pushing things at our teachers at a rapid pace: SmartBoards, math games, a new student information system/gradebook/parent portal, streaming digital video, a "common assessments" program, expectations of teacher created webpages, etc. All this on top of a new "professional learning community" approach to self-directed, evidence-based staff development. A new "strategic road map." Higher percentages of ELL, FRP, and SpEd students. Nastier state tests and passage rates required for graduation. Whew!

Maybe applying the techno-brakes a little in 09-10 might be a good thing. A hard look at our tech and library budgets is in order. As I myself preached in 1995:

As much as I hate sounding like a Republican*, I have to say more money is not always the answer to better services to staff and students. A good budget requires planning, prioritizing, and accountability. When those things are done, better programming is the result - even without an increase in funds. (Budgeting for Mean, Lean Times.)

Can budget reductions ever have positive outcomes?

* For you whipper-snappers, back in '95 the Republican party was considered not just socially, but fiscally conservative as well.

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (3)

I totally agree! I just might scream if my district presents another piece of technology to me. They give us a 30 minute training course and then send us out the door to fend for ourselves. Maybe we can actually focus on education and how to properly use the technology we currently have.

November 25, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterEarl Edmunds

Ah yes: nothing clears the mind like a complete lack of options.

It's the difference between prose and poetry: the author has few if any limits on her expression. The poet, on the other hand, is forced to fit withing certain arbitrary restrictions. Paradoxically, though, we think of poetry as a richer, more expressive way of writing. Why? Because in wrestling with the restrictions of meter, rhyme and so on, the poet is forced to really really confront what she wants to say. Constraints don't just enable creativity, they nurture it.

I think that your right when you say the same is true--or can be true--with ed tech (and other budget issues). Constraints of budgets may support an approach to ed tech that's more poetic--sparser, but more, expressive.

November 25, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterJason Priem

Earl,

I expect you could run for office on your statement. It must reflect the opinion of 99% of teachers.

Thanks for writing and all the best,

Doug

Hi Jason,

Interesting analogy. I hope my budget art form is more novella than haiku, however.

Thanks for the interesting idea.

All the best,

Doug

November 27, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterDoug Johnson

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>