« BFTP: Is there a place for fear mongering? | Main | Advice to strivers »
Thursday
Feb212013

A creativity rubric by Ric Nudell

A Blue Skunk Reader, Ric Nudell, in reaction to last week's post that wondered if creativity was assessable, wrote:
Your posts on this subject are interesting and thought-provoking. As a Digital Media teacher I do try to help students develop creativity (or creative approaches to problem solving.) So...I do need to give them feedback on it, i.e. assess.

I am attaching one of the rubrics I use with students. It is a synthesis of a lot of research about the characteristics of creativity/creative approaches and forms a framework for conversations. There is more elaborate documentation with it (isn't there always), but the rubric can probably stand alone.

Ric Nudell, Digital Media Arts Instructor
Barre Technical Center
Barre, Vermont 05641
www.barretechnicalcenter.org.

Posted with permission:
___________________________________________________________

Evidence of Creative Problem Solving Rubric (link to better formatted pdf)

Project: __________________________________________

Student: _________________________________________

Category

Indicators in Evidence

Generating Ideas

 

___ Fluency: generated many ideas

___ Flexibility: looked at problem in a variety of ways

___ Originality: ideas are different than what is already out there

___ Elaboration: adding nuance, making ideas richer

___ Symbolic  Thinking: making connections, comparisons, analogies

 

Digging Deeper into Ideas

 

___ Analyzing: thinking about what makes the idea(s) work

___ Synthesizing: putting one or more ideas together

___ Reorganizing/Redefining: modifying the original ideas

___ Resolving ambiguity: clarifying, focusing, refining ideas

___ Working with Complexity: building relationships, levels

 

Courage to Explore Ideas

 

___ Problem sensitivity: matching solutions to initial problems

___ Curiosity and Risk Taking: out-of-the-box ideas

___ Humor, playfulness, fantasy, feelings: inner emotional content

___ Integration of dichotomies: inclusion of opposing concepts

___ Growth: working with ideas/places that are personally new

 

Listening to One’s Inner Voice

 

___ Sense of purpose: reasons for choices

___ Persistence/Hard work: followed vision to completion

___ Rejects stereotypes: concepts move beyond stereotypes

 

 

Student: _______(date)                  Peer: ________ (date)                  Instructor: _______ (date)

 

Assessment:                   Excellent                  Good                  Fair                  Poor

 ___________________________________________________________

Ric, I am still thinking about this one. It's one of the most thoughtful attempts at measuring creativity I've seen. I really like that it is used, as you write, as "a framework for conversations." 

But my main question still persists: Do we really want to evaluate creativity in and of itself - or do we want to evaluate the impact creativity may have on the effectiveness of a product, a solution, or a task?

I'm guessing you will be asked by many for permission to use this tool!

Thanks again for allowing me to share.

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (2)

Ah. Great question. The rubric jis ust part of the scoring on projects the students do. There is no 'creativity' assessment by itself. There is assessment of evidence of pre-planning, their demonstration of skills, did they take an approach that 'displays some of the characteristics of a creative approach', etc. RN

February 21, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterRic Nudell

As a former classroom teacher, I think this is a great tool for evaluating creativity as a critical thinking tool. It's characteristics help weed out those ideas that are essentially learners spewing ideas in the name of brainstorming -- without actually putting any thought into what they are saying.

February 21, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterNatalie Parker

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>