« Why your library's digital resources go unused and a golden opportunity | Main | Love, balance and critical thinking »
Friday
Jan222016

Publisher pulls book. Should your school?

I learned about Scholastic’s new children’s book, A Birthday Cake for George Washington, when a friend emailed me on Friday to ask, “Uh … have you seen this [expletive]?” Her note was accompanied by the book’s back cover, which depicted an illustration of a smiling enslaved man and child, accompanied by their beaming master—America’s first president, George Washington. Washington had his arm around the enslaved man’s shoulder like they were bros instead of oppressor and oppressed. 

My knee-jerk reaction was a string of expletives as I tried to process this level of disrespect. Can you imagine a modern-day American publisher pushing a book about a cheery Jewish father and daughter on a trivial mission to bake a cake for the birthday of, say, an SS guard at Auschwitz? Can you picture a children’s book depicting a Jewish dad and child at a concentration camp snuggled up and cozy with Hitler?

Never! So why is it somehow OK to show enslaved black folks practically cuddling with their oppressors?

D'Oyley, Demetria Lucas. After Outrage Publisher Pulls Happy Slaves Children's Book The Root, January 17, 2016

_________________________________________________________

In crafting the narrative for this book, culinary historian and Washington scholar, Ramin Ganeshram, took great care in contextualizing Hercules and Delia as enslaved people, while at the same time accurately depicting Hercules as the notable figure he was.  In her extensive author’s note, Ramin clearly and carefully addresses the cruel injustice of slavery, as well as the vicious complexity of slavery that George Washington himself faced.  In the book, Ramin notes that George Washington understood that it was evil to own fellow human beings, and that he was very conflicted about his part in the wicked institution known as slavery. Slavery’s injustice is also cited on the book’s front flap, so that any parent or teacher will know that this is an aspect of the story, and that it is to be addressed.

Pinkney, Andrea Davis*. A proud slice of history On Our Minds (Scholastic blog), January 6, 2016

_______________________________________________________________

In Monday's blog post, I wrote that our schools should be producing thinkers, not believers.  The controversy and multiple points of view surrounding the publication and subsequent withdrawal by Scholastic of A Birthday Cake for George Washington is a case-in-point argument for this approach to education and why all educators, not just librarians, should be staunch proponents of intellectual freedom for both children and adults.

No book, no idea, no resource should be unilaterally withdrawn from a public school because it offends a single individual or group. I cannot defend A Birthday Cake but what I will defend is any material's right to due process before it is withdrawn from a school. (See Don't Defend That Book.) And as an educator, I believe materials like this should be the catalyst for "teachable moments," with students being asked to consider important questions about slavery, historical context**, the source of happiness, and the ability for an individual to excel under difficult conditions.

A concern was raised in my district about our teachers' ability to have such conversations. Is the rank-and-file teacher sufficiently culturally proficient to hold meaningful discussions on topics like this? It is a valid concern. Quite honestly, I don't know that my own level of CP is (or perhaps ever will be) high enough to be able to fully consider all the issues and understandings a book like A Birthday Cake raises.

But I ask myself does my personal imperfection - or any teacher's - justify not discussing controversial issues and asking students to consider multiple perspectives related to them? Asking students to think, not to believe.

While it may not rise to the level of seriousness of cultural proficiency, were we to not give educators computers until they were all "technologically" proficient, I suspect we would still be using a lot of typewriters.

OK, readers, have at me...

* "[Pinkney is] Coretta Scott King award winner, founder of "Jump at the Sun" (the first dedicated African-American imprint in children's books) at Hyperion, and probably our most honored and respected editor of color in children's books)" Bruce Coville

** Something these reviews made me think about were the sorts of things that are socially acceptable today that future generations will find abhorrent - buying clothes made in sweat shops; using fossil fuels; eating meat; allowing children to live in poverty; insisting on private health care; permitting a minimum wage salary which cannot support a family, etc.

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (2)

Glad to read this post of yours, Doug. I like it when you talk books.

I find this situation to be a very complex and quite a painful conversation. I am thinking about the educational values you describe, the intellectual freedom values that Megan Schliesman describes in Reading While White ( http://readingwhilewhite.blogspot.com/2016/01/no-text-is-sacred.html ), and the amazing research and thoughtful efforts that went into creating the book, as described in the CBCDiversity post by the author Ramin Ganeshram ( http://www.cbcdiversity.com/post/137284630773/the-first-bite-slicing-through-a-birthday-cake-to ). I also have valued the words of the esteemed and amazing editor Andrea Davis Pinkney, where she reveals so much about the intent and work behind this book ( http://oomscholasticblog.com/post/proud-slice-history ). I also think about my biases, my political beliefs, and my commitment to education perpetuating thought and evidence-based insights. So complicated....

I have sadness and confusion, and no answers to share. I worry about a precedent of readers calling for publishers to cease distribution and/or recall books. Somehow I can see certain groups of people calling for this....

I hope that the articles I cited above might help your readers get new insights. And the other thing I've done is order the book. I know only a few people that have read it, and I don't feel that I can comment on it until I've experienced and read it myself.

Thanks again for writing about this. My best to you and yours (family, colleagues, and fans). See you somewhere soon I hope.


Nick

January 20, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterNick Glass

Hi Nick,

Thank you so much for your response. I worry that out of fear of criticism, that many thoughtful people will stop discussing issues surrounding cultural diversity and that authors for children and young adults will stop writing books that could draw criticism. Of course I cited Pinkey's post, but I appreciate the Schliesman and Ganeshram links. This has been a great reminder for me that no cultures nor ethnicities can speak with a single voice.

I too would like to actually read a copy of this book, but I am not sure how since is "Currently unavailable" on Amazon and is "Temporarily out of stock online" at Barnes & Noble. May have to see what the physical bookstore has. Like you, I don't much like discussing a book I've not read!

Thanks again and hope to catch up with you soon as well,

Doug​

January 21, 2016 | Registered CommenterDoug Johnson

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>