Danielson's Framework and Tech: Domain 1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fb3b/7fb3bc4497141a6b2840b22bcce1f7117c5af850" alt="Date Date"
Charlotte Danielson in her book Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching organizes effective teaching practices into four domains each with several sub-domains. I've added below some possible areas regarding teacher technology use as it impacts and improves teacher performance in each area. (See Framework for Teaching - and Technology)
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
- Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy
- Demonstrating Knowledge of Students
- Setting Instructional Outcomes
- Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources
- Designing Coherent Instruction Designing Student Assessments
Technology-related competencies in this area.
- Teacher uses online resources, including professional social networking sites, to stay current on the latest research and best practices in his/her field.
- Teacher is aware of the characteristics of "net generation" learners and their relationship with technology and its uses. Teacher uses this information in using technology in the classroom to design engaging activities.
- The teacher determines the technology skill level of students, knows the expected competencies for productivity and research, and finds means of remediation of individual students when needed.
- Teacher uses adaptive and adoptive technologies with special needs students.
- Teacher establishes appropriate goals for technology applications for students.
- Teacher knows, accesses and uses digital resources provided by the state and district, including productivity tools, online teaching/reference materials, and textbook supplemental materials. Teacher uses other digital materials available online outside the district that support student learning.
- Teacher designs learning activities that use the technology resources available.
- Teacher uses online resources to provide instructional materials at differing levels and subjects to meet individual student abilities, needs and interests.
- Student work assessment criteria includes qualitative indicators of effective technology production.
What's missing? What doesn't fit? I suspect these could be easily put into rubric form and made more individualized by district.