« Adaptable spaces | Main | Bird noises and building design »
Saturday
May102008

Why manufacturing jobs are going away

From David Brook's column "The Cognitive Age,"  New York Times, May 2, 2008

The chief force reshaping manufacturing is technological change (hastened by competition with other companies in Canada, Germany or down the street). Thanks to innovation, manufacturingRobotichand.jpg productivity has doubled over two decades. Employers now require fewer but more highly skilled workers. Technological change affects China just as it does the America. William Overholt of the RAND Corporation has noted that between 1994 and 2004 the Chinese shed 25 million manufacturing jobs, 10 times more than the U.S.

The central process driving this is not globalization. It’s the skills revolution. We’re moving into a more demanding cognitive age. In order to thrive, people are compelled to become better at absorbing, processing and combining information. This is happening in localized and globalized sectors, and it would be happening even if you tore up every free trade deal ever inked.

Hmmmm, sounds like what I heard on Minnesota Public Radio not that long ago. Maybe if David Brooks says it, people will listen. Or not.

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (2)

Manufacturing jobs have been gone a long, long time. Unfortunately, this "Cognitive Age" stuff is really just happy talk -- LOOK AT THE DATA --> http://www.bls.gov/oco/oco2003.htm

May 10, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterTom Hoffman

Hi Tom,

All I know is that we have a manufacturing labor shortage in MN. But it is skilled positions that are needed (cognitive?) The non-skilled mfg jobs are long gone, for sure.

Doug

May 11, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterDoug Johnson

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>